Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > But it is a "sect1" in libpq. It should be a "sect1" somewhere that
> > makes more sense.
> > ...
> > It doesn't belong in libpq, and it doesn't belong in the Programmer's
> > Guide.
> How could it not belong in libpq? But you are right that the
> Programmer's Guide seems the wrong place for information that
> is important to end-users.
Some people don't even know libpq exists. If someone uses only
psql, how would they know?
> Perhaps libpq needs to have a chapter in the User's Guide as
> well as a chapter in the Programmer's Guide?
> Or maybe we could put the relevant information into a reference
> page under PostgreSQL Client Applications (titled something
> along the line of "common behavior of all libpq-based client
Yep, that's what I would do.
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2003-01-04 01:34:02|
|Subject: Re: Threads |
|Previous:||From: Lamar Owen||Date: 2003-01-04 01:32:15|
|Subject: Re: Upgrading rant.|