Florian Weimer wrote:
> "Neil Conway" <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> 
> > Christopher Kings-Lynne said:
> >> There have been HEAPS of security fixes between 7.2 and 7.3.
> >
> > That's only the case if your definition of a "security fix" is pretty fast
> > and loose -- as yours seems to be.
> 
> Hmm?  On 7.2, an unpriviliged database user can read the more or less
> the whole memory image of the server process.  On 7.3, this has been
> fixed.

Huh.  Never heard that before.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

• Re: why was libpq.so's version number bumped? at 2003-01-03 09:57:01 from Florian Weimer

Responses

• Re: why was libpq.so's version number bumped? at 2003-01-03 23:18:55 from Florian Weimer

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Florian Weimer	Date: 2003-01-03 23:18:55
	Subject: Re: why was libpq.so's version number bumped?
Previous:	From: Serguei Mokhov	Date: 2003-01-03 22:54:20
	Subject: Re: Threads