On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Thursday 02 January 2003 18:32, Tom Lane wrote:
> > BTW, the Red Hat RHDB group has spent a fair amount of time rethinking
> > the overall organization of the docs and trying to organize 'em in a
> > more logical order. They'd like to contribute that work back so they
> > don't have to maintain a variant version of the docs. Is this a good
> > time to think about looking over what they've done?
> See the links on the left under 'RHDB 2.1 Documentation'.
> They are quite good.
they look like our docs ... what is different?
In response to
pgsql-docs by date
|Next:||From: Marc G. Fournier||Date: 2003-01-03 01:03:28|
|Subject: Re: Documentation in book length |
|Previous:||From: Lamar Owen||Date: 2003-01-02 23:41:23|
|Subject: Re: Documentation in book length|