Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Documentation in book length

From: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Documentation in book length
Date: 2003-01-02 23:41:23
Message-ID: 200301021841.23651.lamar.owen@wgcr.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs
On Thursday 02 January 2003 18:32, Tom Lane wrote:
> BTW, the Red Hat RHDB group has spent a fair amount of time rethinking
> the overall organization of the docs and trying to organize 'em in a
> more logical order.  They'd like to contribute that work back so they
> don't have to maintain a variant version of the docs.  Is this a good
> time to think about looking over what they've done?

http://sources.redhat.com/rhdb/

See the links on the left under 'RHDB 2.1 Documentation'.

They are quite good.
-- 
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11


In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2003-01-03 01:00:04
Subject: Re: Documentation in book length
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-01-02 23:36:03
Subject: Re: Documentation in book length

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group