Re: Bug in Dependencies Code in 7.3.x?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tara Piorkowski <tara(at)vilaj(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bug in Dependencies Code in 7.3.x?
Date: 2002-12-31 17:32:07
Message-ID: 200212311732.gBVHW7T21901@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Seems this is already a TODO:
> > * Have sequence dependency track use of DEFAULT sequences, seqname.nextval
>
> That's related but not the same issue.

Related in that ALTER TABLE DROP DEFAULT _doesn't_ see a dependancy for
sequences in a DEFAULT?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-12-31 17:38:29 Re: PostgreSQL Password Cracker
Previous Message Devrim GUNDUZ 2002-12-31 17:20:58 PostgreSQL Password Cracker