Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Bug in Dependencies Code in 7.3.x?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tara Piorkowski <tara(at)vilaj(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bug in Dependencies Code in 7.3.x?
Date: 2002-12-31 17:32:07
Message-ID: 200212311732.gBVHW7T21901@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Seems this is already a TODO:
> > 	* Have sequence dependency track use of DEFAULT sequences, seqname.nextval
> 
> That's related but not the same issue.

Related in that ALTER TABLE DROP DEFAULT _doesn't_ see a dependancy for
sequences in a DEFAULT?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-12-31 17:38:29
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Password Cracker
Previous:From: Devrim GUNDUZDate: 2002-12-31 17:20:58
Subject: PostgreSQL Password Cracker

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group