| From: | Dan Langille <dan(at)langille(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Palle Girgensohn <girgen(at)pingpong(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: why was libpq.so's version number bumped? |
| Date: | 2002-12-30 11:24:38 |
| Message-ID: | 20021230062238.A47916-100000@m20.unixathome.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 30 Dec 2002, Palle Girgensohn wrote:
> One of the reasons I ask is, if it is a good reason, like say "security",
> maybe I can persuade the FreeBSD port responsible guys to bring the port
> into the upcoming FreeBSD 5.0 release. The port freeze was introduced just
> before pg-7.3 was released, so nothing new will be admitted unless it is a
> security fix, more or less, which means FreeBSD 5.0 will probably ship with
> 7.2.3, which would be a disappointment...
If anything, the ports tree on the CD will contain a reference to 7.2.3.
PostgreSQL itself is not shipped. The ports tree can be cvsup'd to the
latest, when the cvs repository is updated. At present there is a ports
freeze. This is the normal situation just prior to a major release.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dan Langille | 2002-12-30 11:28:46 | Re: why was libpq.so's version number bumped? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-12-30 04:59:21 | Re: Patch for DBD::Pg pg_relcheck problem |