Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: why was libpq.so's version number bumped?

From: Dan Langille <dan(at)langille(dot)org>
To: Palle Girgensohn <girgen(at)pingpong(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: why was libpq.so's version number bumped?
Date: 2002-12-30 11:24:38
Message-ID: 20021230062238.A47916-100000@m20.unixathome.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 30 Dec 2002, Palle Girgensohn wrote:

> One of the reasons I ask is, if it is a good reason, like say "security",
> maybe I can persuade the FreeBSD port responsible guys to bring the port
> into the upcoming FreeBSD 5.0 release. The port freeze was introduced just
> before pg-7.3 was released, so nothing new will be admitted unless it is a
> security fix, more or less, which means FreeBSD 5.0 will probably ship with
> 7.2.3, which would be a disappointment...

If anything, the ports tree on the CD will contain a reference to 7.2.3.
PostgreSQL itself is not shipped.  The ports tree can be cvsup'd to the
latest, when the cvs repository is updated.  At present there is a ports
freeze.  This is the normal situation just prior to a major release.


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Dan LangilleDate: 2002-12-30 11:28:46
Subject: Re: why was libpq.so's version number bumped?
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-12-30 04:59:21
Subject: Re: Patch for DBD::Pg pg_relcheck problem

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group