> On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Philip Warner wrote:
> > At 10:49 PM 18/12/2002 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >I don't think we can bump that up in a minor.
> > Why not? It's a relatively serious problem with the default config.
> > >Should we?
> > Yes.
> I concur. The problems of a too-low fsm setting are serious, and I can't
> see setting fsm to 1000 creating problems for anyone. That's actually
> still a pretty low number for production servers.
OK, I agree it should be bumped up, but the issue is whether to do that
in a minor release. It will increase shared memory by 36k. Is that
safe in a beta? Tom, Mr. FSM, can you comment?
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2002-12-19 17:21:03|
|Subject: Re: please apply patch to CVS ( 7.3 and 7.4dev)|
|Previous:||From: scott.marlowe||Date: 2002-12-19 17:08:29|
|Subject: Re: v7.3.1 tar ready ... please check it ...|