| From: | Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> |
|---|---|
| To: | PgSQL Performance ML <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: performance of insert/delete/update |
| Date: | 2002-11-26 16:54:17 |
| Message-ID: | 20021126115417.H12832@mail.libertyrms.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 07:41:03PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> What if you are in a 24x365 environment? Doing a VACUUM ANALYZE would
> really slow down the nightly operations.
Why? After upgrading to 7.2, we find it a good idea to do frequent
vacuum analyse on frequently-changed tables. It doesn't block, and
if you vacuum frequently enough, it goes real fast.
A
--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-11-26 17:33:17 | Article on Linkers/Loaders |
| Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2002-11-26 16:49:18 | Re: performance of insert/delete/update |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | scott.marlowe | 2002-11-26 18:06:47 | Re: performance of insert/delete/update |
| Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2002-11-26 16:49:18 | Re: performance of insert/delete/update |