Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Geometry test on NetBSD (was Re: [HACKERS] RC1?)

From: Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org,pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Geometry test on NetBSD (was Re: [HACKERS] RC1?)
Date: 2002-11-20 18:44:12
Message-ID: 20021120184412.H25210@quartz.newn.cam.ac.uk (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-ports
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 01:21:47PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk> writes:
... 
> > NetBSD 1.5 has revision 1.32, NetBSD 1.6 has revision 1.42
> 
> Ah-hah, so it is a version issue --- we could make the resultmap line
> something like
> 	geometry/.*-netbsd1.[0-5]=geometry-positive-zeros
> 
> Would you confirm what config.guess prints on your box --- in
> particular, is there a dot in the version number?

Yes:

NetBSD/i386-1.6H     i386-unknown-netbsdelf1.6H     (checked 7.3rc1)
NetBSD/acorn32-1.6K  arm-unknown-netbsdelf1.6K      (still building 7.3rc1)

(several NetBSDs probably come up with arm-unknown..)

Cheers,

Patrick

In response to

Responses

pgsql-ports by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-11-20 18:51:28
Subject: Re: Geometry test on NetBSD (was Re: [HACKERS] RC1?)
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-11-20 18:23:34
Subject: Re: Geometry test on NetBSD (was Re: [HACKERS] RC1?)

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-11-20 18:51:28
Subject: Re: Geometry test on NetBSD (was Re: [HACKERS] RC1?)
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-11-20 18:23:34
Subject: Re: Geometry test on NetBSD (was Re: [HACKERS] RC1?)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group