| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: CLUSTER ALL syntax |
| Date: | 2002-11-18 17:17:08 |
| Message-ID: | 200211181717.gAIHH8125455@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 04:42:01PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > > In looking at the CLUSTER ALL patch I have applied, I am now wondering
> > > why the ALL keyword is used. When we do VACUUM, we don't use ALL.
> > > VACUUM vacuums all tables. Shouldn't' CLUSTER alone do the same thing.
> >
> > I agree, lose the ALL.
>
> Well, in my original patch (the one submitted just when 7.3 was going
> into beta) there was no ALL. I decided to put it in for subsequent
> patches for no good reason.
I have updated CVS to make the syntax CLUSTER rather than CLUSTER ALL.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Haris Peco | 2002-11-18 17:32:36 | Re: DECLARE CURSOR |
| Previous Message | David Wheeler | 2002-11-18 17:17:05 | Re: DBD::PostgreSQL |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2002-11-18 18:13:35 | Re: CLUSTER ALL patch |
| Previous Message | Rod Taylor | 2002-11-18 17:00:21 | Transaction safe Truncate |