Re: Sort time

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>
Cc: pginfo <pginfo(at)t1(dot)unisoftbg(dot)com>, "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Sort time
Date: 2002-11-15 19:27:29
Message-ID: 200211151127.29405.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance


Rod,

> The estimated cost had the sort at a few seconds, but the actual times
> show it is taking 50% of the total query time.

D'oh! I was, of course, subtracting the estimated from the actual time.
Oops.

>
> The big problem is he's sorting by a varchar() which isn't overly quick
> no matter what locale. Integers are nice and quick (s.OP is an int,
> which shows this).
>
> If IDS_NUM is a number, he could try casting it to an int8, but without
> data examples I couldn't say.

Hmmm ... how big *is* that varchar field? 8 characters gives us about 6mb for
the column. Of course, if it's a 128-char global unque id, that;s a bit
larger.

--
-Josh Berkus

______AGLIO DATABASE SOLUTIONS___________________________
Josh Berkus
Complete information technology josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
and data management solutions (415) 565-7293
for law firms, small businesses fax 621-2533
and non-profit organizations. San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2002-11-15 19:28:39 Re: Sort time
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2002-11-15 18:55:11 Re: [GENERAL] Upgrade to dual processor machine?