Re: [GENERAL] psql: \pset pager 'always'?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
Cc: PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] psql: \pset pager 'always'?
Date: 2002-11-08 19:10:15
Message-ID: 200211081910.gA8JAFu29222@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-patches


OK, I have applied the following patch for 7.4. I made the following
changes:

o Pager code is now centralized in PageOutput
o You used 'small' when you meant 'short' in a few places
o Added documentation
o Fixed bug where '\pset pager' crashed psql

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

greg(at)turnstep(dot)com wrote:
> > I'm really annoyed by that little 'feature' of psql that decides whether
> > to use pager or not. I personally use GNU 'less' with options -S -F as my
> > pager, which allows me to scroll vertically AS WELL AS horizontally on
> > long input. So a "use pager always" option with no strange automagic
> > behaviour would be nice.
>
> Not a bad idea. Here is a patch that does just that, while maintaining the
> "traditional" behavior, so the change should be transparent. Use the
> command "\pset pager always" to turn it on. Anything else does the
> normal toggle between "on" and "off"

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

Attachment Content-Type Size
unknown_filename text/plain 7.1 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Swan 2002-11-08 19:17:29 Re: Can't connect to PGSQL
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2002-11-08 19:01:05 Re: OT: mailing list delays

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2002-11-08 19:19:47 _getPlan missing support for some Plan node elements
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-11-08 17:59:52 Re: one last patch - array lower and upper bound