| From: | Jason Tishler <jason(at)tishler(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pgsql-Cygwin <pgsql-cygwin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms |
| Date: | 2002-10-29 21:17:38 |
| Message-ID: | 20021029211738.GA1492@tishler.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-cygwin pgsql-hackers |
Dave,
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 09:00:20PM -0000, Dave Page wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason(at)tishler(dot)net]
> > Sent: 29 October 2002 18:58
> >
> > > Hackers: As the Cygwin release that is actively supported is the
> > > binary distribution that Jason builds, I would think this is OK to
> > > be listed as supported if no-one disagrees...
^^^^^^^^^
*********
> > Umm... Should I disagree? :,)
>
> Entirely up to you - you do the build :-).
I was meekly trying to voice my concern about who supplies the "support"
mentioned above.
> I'm just pointing out that the line wrt to Cygwin is generally "use
> the standard package", so if we stick to that, as long as you build it
> OK, most people needn't worry 'bout hacking stdio.h.
If my patch gets accepted, then the stdio.h hack won't be necessary for
anyone (after the next Cygwin release).
Jason
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Glenn Murray | 2002-10-29 23:37:12 | Re: Simplifying Cygwin PosgreSQL Installation |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2002-10-29 21:00:20 | Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Shibashish | 2002-10-29 21:19:16 | PostgreSQL Installation on SCO |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2002-10-29 21:10:52 | Re: Request for supported platforms |