Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: plpq

From: Darko Prenosil <darko(dot)prenosil(at)finteh(dot)hr>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: plpq
Date: 2002-10-29 08:27:11
Message-ID: 200210290827.11286.darko.prenosil@finteh.hr (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
	It is wrapper about libpq client library functions for use in PL/PSQL.
I agreed with Joe Conway that it may fit within dblink, because dblink is much
more easy to work with than the libpq, but sometimes it is Just not enough.
So, the idea is to re-implement all important libpq functions like 
PQConnectdb,
PQExec ... and make one postgres server become just a client for another (or 
another's) postgres server. As You know, dblink still does not support 
simultaneous connections to two different databases, but with this it can !
I agreed with Joe that when he is back from holiday he will take a look.

Regards !

On Monday 28 October 2002 20:35, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Would you tell us exactly what this is.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Darko Prenosil wrote:
> > 	Tree weeks later than I promised, but it is finished (I hope).
> >
> > In attachment are files:
> > 	dblink.c
> > 	dblink.h
> > 	dblink.sql.in
> > 	pqtest.sql
> >
> > In file pqtest.sql is sample queries and results. It seem OK to me.
> >
> > There are two reasons why I did not make a diff.
> >
> > 1. The source I started from is 7.3b1, not the latest.
> > 2. I would like You to check the code, especially the part that touches
> > memory management.
> > I can say that it works, but I do not know exactly why, and this can be
> > dangerous. With my knowledge of postgres internals this is
> > as far I can go at the moment. And once more sorry for bad English !
> >
> > Regards !
>
> [ Attachment, skipping... ]
>
> [ Attachment, skipping... ]
>
> [ Attachment, skipping... ]
>
> [ Attachment, skipping... ]
>
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly


In response to

  • Re: plpq at 2002-10-28 20:35:03 from Bruce Momjian

Responses

  • Re: plpq at 2002-10-29 17:39:40 from Bruce Momjian

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Vladimir ChukharevDate: 2002-10-29 08:46:02
Subject: Is regress/report.php in use?
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2002-10-29 08:21:17
Subject: Re: Request for supported platforms

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group