Am Montag, 28. Oktober 2002 22:56 schrieb eric soroos:
> 0 gives better latency if the controller reads from whichever gets the data
> first. It's unclear if IDE or software raid actually does this though. 1
> Gives better throughput, at a cost to latency.
> 5 Like 1 but with redundancy. It's unclear if I'll be able to do this
> without hardware SCSI raid.
Just for the raid part, we've very good expiriences with Raid 10. Performs well and has mirroring. Avoid Raid 5 if possible, write performance will suffer greatly.
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Andrew Sullivan||Date: 2002-10-29 13:38:24|
|Subject: Re: [pgsql-performance] Performance Problems|
|Previous:||From: Shridhar Daithankar||Date: 2002-10-29 06:30:45|
|Subject: Re: Low Budget Performance|