On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 11:58:35PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 11:12:01PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >
> > > Tom's idea of doing this as part of the already added per-user/per-db
> > > settings seems like a good direction to take.
> > Yes, but how? The current implementation has a setting column in
> > pg_shadow, and another in pg_database. Is the idea to create a separate
> > pg_settings table or something like that?
> Are you asking how to do per-db-user combination settings, like User A
> can have only two connections to database B? Seems we should get
> per-user and per-db settings working first and see if anyone needs
> combination settings.
Well, now that I think about it... the "user local to database" (those
with the @dbname appended and all that) idea may very well cover the
ground for this. But I'm not actually asking, because I don't need it.
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"Aprender sin pensar es inutil; pensar sin aprender, peligroso" (Confucio)
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Jesus M. Milan-Franco||Date: 2002-10-27 08:43:05|
|Subject: Help compiling postgres|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2002-10-27 03:58:35|
|Subject: Re: idle connection timeout ...|