Re: idle connection timeout ...

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
Cc: PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: idle connection timeout ...
Date: 2002-10-25 19:02:52
Message-ID: 200210251902.g9PJ2qx22874@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 11:02:48AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > So? If it hits the installation-wide limit, you'll have the same
> > problem; and at that point the (presumably runaway) app would have
> > sucked up all the connections, denying service to other apps using other
> > databases. I think Marc's point here is to limit his exposure to
> > misbehavior of any one client app, in a database server that is serving
> > multiple clients using multiple databases.
>
> That would indeed be a useful item. The only way to avoid such
> exposure right now is to run another back end.

Added to TODO:

* Allow limits on per-db/user connections

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mike Benoit 2002-10-25 19:16:50 Re: idle connection timeout ...
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2002-10-25 18:47:01 Re: idle connection timeout ...