| From: | Anuradha Ratnaweera <anuradha(at)lklug(dot)pdn(dot)ac(dot)lk> |
|---|---|
| To: | Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases |
| Date: | 2002-10-11 11:15:00 |
| Message-ID: | 20021011111500.GA8065@lklug.pdn.ac.lk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 04:29:53PM +0530, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
>
> Well, I don't think adding support for multiple slaves to usogres would be that
> problematic. Of course if you want to load balance your application queries,
> application has to be aware of that. I will not do sending requests to a mosix
> cluster anyway.
Have already tested postgres on a mosix cluster, and as expected results
are not good. (although mosix does the correct thing in keeping all the
database backend processes on one node).
Anuradha
--
Debian GNU/Linux (kernel 2.4.18-xfs-1.1)
Remember: Silly is a state of Mind, Stupid is a way of Life.
-- Dave Butler
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-10-11 12:12:50 | Re: [HACKERS] number of attributes in page files? |
| Previous Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2002-10-11 10:59:53 | Re: Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rod Taylor | 2002-10-11 11:56:14 | Re: .cvsignore file |
| Previous Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2002-10-11 10:59:53 | Re: Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases |