Re: GRANT on functions/languages

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: GRANT on functions/languages
Date: 2002-10-10 04:56:54
Message-ID: 200210100456.g9A4usq18821@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Now that we have relaxed the restriction on functions/languages, should
> > we make sure we have GRANTS for all of them, including /contrib, or
> > remove them all.
>
> I feel no strong need to do anything. The contrib entries that have
> explicit GRANTs are okay and pretty future-proof; but the ones that
> don't have 'em are not broken. We have other problems to contend with
> that deserve more attention than this one...

I was looking for consistency so we could have things ready if we
tighten up in 7.4. I believe someone volunteered to fix them all so I
figured we should do that.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-10-10 05:05:24 Re: GRANT on functions/languages
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-10-10 04:56:04 Re: inline newNode()