Re: multi-column btree index for real values

Ok. I don't have the disk space to migrate to 7.3 right now.
Our database is about 500 million tuples with about 100 fields.
However, I checked out the beta source and noticed the following new
lines near line 934 in src/backend/access/rtree/rtree.c in 7.2.2:

+ pfree(DatumGetPointer(union_dl));
+ pfree(DatumGetPointer(union_dr));

Looks like a leak fix to me. Patching these in, I found that the leak
is much reduced; still looks like a tiny leak remains. We will try
7.3beta asap.

Thanks.

Bruce Momjian wrote on Sat, 05 Oct 2002 17:39:45 EDT
>Martin Weinberg wrote:
>> Thanks Bruce. Some simple tests on a 10 million tuple data base shows
>> that r-tree works well for this. (It took me a while to realize
>> that I had to sort boxes of zero area rather than points).
>>
>> However, it seems that the rtree index has a serious memory leak for
>> 7.2.2. Is that known?
>
>Uh, I am not aware of that, but you can try 7.3beta to see if it is
>better, and if not, report back.
>
>--
> Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
> pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
> + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
> + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>