From: | Andriy Tkachuk <ant(at)imt(dot)com(dot)ua> |
---|---|
To: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, <uzel(at)imt(dot)com(dot)ua> |
Subject: | Re: query speed depends on lifetime of frozen db? |
Date: | 2002-09-27 14:58:05 |
Message-ID: | 20020927175503.B28121-100000@pool.imt.com.ua |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 01:28:13PM +0300, Andriy Tkachuk wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> > > What is the output of EXPLAIN ANALYSE <query>;
> >
> > There is EXPLAIN ANALYSE when query is heavy:
>
> Oookaaay. Your query is *evil*. 14 subqueries executed for *each* row of
> output!?! I reackon you could improve your query just by rewriting it into a
> better form. How can you have 10 subqueries to the same table?
>
> Anyway, the only thing that seems to change is the statistics, which leads
> me to beleive that all that is happening is that the planner is reordering some
> of your clauses causing it to execute expensive ones it may otherwise be
> able to avoid. In your case the default statistics do better than the real
> ones.
YES! You right!
Just after restirong db i made vacuumdb -z -f
and query become heavy!
Does one have any ideas how to ovecome this!?
Thanks a lot Martijn,
Andriy.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Naeslund(f) | 2002-09-27 15:13:23 | How do i make use of listen/notify properly |
Previous Message | Karel Zak | 2002-09-27 14:16:51 | Re: Formatting numbers in psql? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | scott.marlowe | 2002-09-27 15:16:03 | Re: Performance while loading data and indexing |
Previous Message | Masaru Sugawara | 2002-09-27 14:53:04 | Re: About connectby() again |