Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: postmaster -d option (was Re: [GENERAL] Relation 0 does not exist)

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk>,pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: postmaster -d option (was Re: [GENERAL] Relation 0 does not exist)
Date: 2002-09-26 05:16:12
Message-ID: 200209260516.g8Q5GCx04205@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > ... Now, we just have the GUC value which does
> > propogate like the global one did.  Does the postmaster still pass -dX
> > down to the child like it used to?
> 
> Evidently not; else Patrick wouldn't be complaining that it doesn't
> work like it used to.

OK, got it.  I knew server_min_messages would propogate to the client,
but that doesn't trigger the -d special cases in postgres.c.  I re-added
the -d flag propogation to the postmaster.  I also changed the postgres
-d0 behavior to just reset server_min_messages rather than setting it to
'notice.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-09-26 05:23:06
Subject: Re: Memory Errors...
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-09-26 04:40:55
Subject: SSL code fixed

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Gaetano MendolaDate: 2002-09-26 08:07:15
Subject: Re: rotatelog / logrotate with PostgreSQL
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-09-26 04:00:10
Subject: Re: postmaster -d option (was Re: [GENERAL] Relation 0 does not exist)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group