Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?
Date: 2002-09-25 19:18:52
Message-ID: 200209251918.g8PJIr601400@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jan Wieck wrote:
> > It's almost like people *don't* want to put this in the config file
> > or something....
>
> I want to have it it the config file. Just that that doesn't
> prevent anything. And if we have a "signature" file in the xlog
> and data directories, you can make it dummy-safe as you like ...
> if the config option is set wrong, first search for it on all
> drives before bailing out and if found, postmaster corrects the
> config setting. That way the admin can play hide and seek with
> our database ... ;-)

Let's get it into GUC and see what problems people have. We may find
out no one has difficulty.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-09-25 19:35:25 Re: New SSL code to be removed
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2002-09-25 19:17:42 Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?