Re: revised patch for PL/PgSQL table functions

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: revised patch for PL/PgSQL table functions
Date: 2002-09-01 22:36:00
Message-ID: 200209012236.g81Ma0a26016@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> > Okay, here's a patch that implements this -- no additional changes to
> > PL/PgSQL were needed, as far as I could tell. I've added some
> > regression tests that cover this new functionality and they seem to
> > work as expected.
>
> Patch applied, with a couple minor documentation/comment fixes.
>
> At this point I believe we have full table function support (return
> a tuple, return a set, return RECORD) for SQL and plpgsql functions.
> That seems like a clean stopping point for 7.3. But there's no
> support at all for these features in pltcl, plperl, or plpython.
> Bruce, would you add a TODO item?
>
> * Add table function support to pltcl, plperl, plpython

Added to TODO.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-09-01 23:03:02 Re: reindex in tab completion
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-09-01 22:15:17 Re: create or replace rule/view (fwd)