Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PG on Win2K

From: Jason Tishler <jason(at)tishler(dot)net>
To: "Nikhil G(dot) Daddikar" <ngd(at)celoxis(dot)com>
Cc: Pgsql-Cygwin <pgsql-cygwin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG on Win2K
Date: 2002-08-30 19:43:06
Message-ID: 20020830194305.GE1424@tishler.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-cygwin
Nikhil,
 
Please keep your replies on-list...

On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 11:21:09PM +0530, Nikhil G. Daddikar wrote:
> : > 2. Is cygwin required?
> : 
> : Currently yes, but soon there should be a straight Win32 version
> : available.  If you choose to wait for the Win32 version, then you
> : can ignore most (if not all) of this email.
> : 
> 
> Thanks for the comprehensive information.

You are welcome.

> Is there any place where I can get more info on the win32 version?

I presume so, but I don't know where.

Jason

In response to

pgsql-cygwin by date

Next:From: Michael LabhardDate: 2002-08-31 16:29:56
Subject: Re: Why sequential scan with index present?
Previous:From: Michael LabhardDate: 2002-08-30 17:25:37
Subject: Why sequential scan with index present?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group