Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [BUGS] Bug #718: request for improvement of /? to

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)atentus(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, ghum(at)gmx(dot)net,pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Bug #718: request for improvement of /? to
Date: 2002-08-29 22:23:32
Message-ID: 20020829182332.363df607.alvherre@atentus.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
En Fri, 30 Aug 2002 00:14:20 +0200 (CEST)
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> escribió:

> Bruce Momjian writes:
> 
> > How do people like the idea of grouping them?  I would do it in psql \?
> > and in the psql manual page.
> 
> Seems reasonable, but then we should also have something along the lines
> of
> 
> \? \r
> 
> so I don't have to dig through the whole pile if I'm interested in a
> particular command.  (cf. \help behavior)

That'd be neat.  Also you can include some meta-items that allow the
display of a single group with more detail.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]atentus.com>)
"Nunca se desea ardientemente lo que solo se desea por razon" (F. Alexandre)

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-08-29 23:05:49
Subject: Re: @(#)Mordre Labs advisory 0x0005: Several buffer overruns
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2002-08-29 22:15:11
Subject: Re: VIRUS IN YOUR MAIL (W32/Klez.h@MM)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group