Re: bug in COPY

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: bug in COPY
Date: 2002-08-27 20:30:53
Message-ID: 200208272030.g7RKUsh12301@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Patch applied.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> The exclamation point seems inappropriate. Perhaps "zero-length input"
> >> would be better than "string" also.
>
> > I copied the other test case:
>
> > if (s == (char *) NULL)
> > elog(ERROR, "pg_atoi: NULL pointer!");
>
> Well, the NULL-pointer test might equally well be coded as an Assert:
> it's to catch backend coding errors, not cases of incorrect user input.
> So the exclamation point there didn't bother me.
>
> > I removed them both '!'.
>
> If you like. But the two conditions are not comparable.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

Attachment Content-Type Size
unknown_filename text/plain 3.3 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-08-27 20:33:30 Re: bug in COPY
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-08-27 20:24:48 Re: bug in COPY