Re: updated lock listing patch

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: updated lock listing patch
Date: 2002-08-17 23:53:26
Message-ID: 200208172353.g7HNrQn13641@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org> writes:
> > Yes, it is. Hopefully I'll get to that before the beta (if I don't,
> > it's something that could go in during a beta cycle, IMHO).
> > The code is fully functional, it's just that the additional view can
> > be done away with.
>
> Please get it done before beta. Removing the view presumably means an
> initdb, and we prefer to avoid those after start of beta. (Sometimes
> they're unavoidable, but this one isn't.)

Yes, unless we had another reason to initdb during beta, it would just
stay in there for 7.3 and be removed in 7.4.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2002-08-18 01:47:29 Regression test updates for domains
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2002-08-17 20:27:19 Re: Dump serials as serial -- not a sequence