| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, sugita(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: int64 timestamp patch for contrib/pg_controldata |
| Date: | 2002-07-31 21:41:57 |
| Message-ID: | 200207312141.g6VLfvp24085@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> > Perhaps. At the time they were written they were just quick hacks for
> > debugging, but we've seen them needed often enough that maybe they need
> > to be promoted.
>
> Yes. Bruce, do you want to do the honors? Should we consider renaming
> them at the time of the move? (probably not, but it is the right time to
> ask)
I thought they were in /contrib because we didn't want them by default
in the admin's path. They have to go looking for them to use them. Is
that still a valid concern?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-07-31 21:49:54 | Re: psql warning fix |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2002-07-31 21:41:12 | fix pg_dump memory leak |