Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Open 7.3 items

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Open 7.3 items
Date: 2002-07-31 20:53:27
Message-ID: 200207312053.g6VKrRY19766@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Neil Conway wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 03:30:30PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Yes, we need someone to benchmark both the NAMEDATALEN and FUNC_MAX_ARGS
> > to prove we are not causing performance problems.  Once that is done,
> > the default limits can be easily increased.  I was thinking 64 for
> > NAMEDATALEN and 32 for FUNC_MAX_ARGS, effectively doubling both.
> 
> If we're going to change NAMEDATALEN, we should probably set it to 128,
> as that's what SQL99 requires.

OK, updated to show only 128.  Do we need more performance testing?  I
am unclear on that.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-07-31 20:54:35
Subject: Re: Open 7.3 items
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-07-31 20:47:58
Subject: Re: Open 7.3 items

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group