Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: lock listing

From: nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org (Neil Conway)
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: lock listing
Date: 2002-07-31 15:01:45
Message-ID: 20020731150145.GB24180@klamath.dyndns.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 03:11:40PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> We have pg_stat_activity.  Seems pg_locks should behave the same,
> without the ().  Let it show up in \dS.  Do you need assistance with
> this?  I know FRS is neat, but logically it seems it should appear as a
> table like that statistics stuff.

So I should just add a view called "pg_locks" that calls the table
function?

I'll submit a new patch once Joe's anonymous composite type patch gets
into CVS.

Cheers,

Neil

-- 
Neil Conway <neilconway(at)rogers(dot)com>
PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-07-31 15:57:38
Subject: Re: default attstattarget
Previous:From: Richard TuckerDate: 2002-07-31 14:58:58
Subject: Patch for roll forward recovery (PITR)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group