From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net> |
Cc: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL? |
Date: | 2002-07-31 03:15:33 |
Message-ID: | 200207310315.g6V3FXH24083@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Curt Sampson wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > You can add children without modifying your code. It is classic C++
> > inheritance; parent table accesses work with the new child tables
> > automatically.
>
> I don't see how my method doesn't do this as well. What code do you have
> to modify in the relational way of doing things that you don't in this
> inheritance way?
Seems like you have to modify your views to handle this, at least in the
example you just posted, right?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Lamar Owen | 2002-07-31 03:18:16 | Re: WAL file location |
Previous Message | Curt Sampson | 2002-07-31 03:14:36 | Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL? |