Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Bug #718: request for improvement of /? to show /d+ /l+

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: ghum(at)gmx(dot)net, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bug #718: request for improvement of /? to show /d+ /l+
Date: 2002-07-30 19:33:26
Message-ID: 200207301933.g6UJXRg13664@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
I am not sure how to do that.  \? is already pretty full on the screen. 
Ideas?


---------------------------------------------------------------------------

pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org wrote:
> Harald Armin Massa (ghum(at)gmx(dot)net) reports a bug with a severity of 3
> The lower the number the more severe it is.
> 
> Short Description
> request for improvement of /? to show /d+  /l+ commands
> 
> Long Description
> Postgres has the EXCELLENT feature 
> 
> COMMENT on <objekt> "My best description ever"
> 
> And there are also the very very usefull commands /d+ and /l+ to actually SEE these comments. But: they are hidden deeply in the documentation; I suggest to include them in the online psql-help shown by \?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Sample Code
> Not needed
> 
> No file was uploaded with this report
> 
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
> 

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-07-30 19:33:28
Subject: Re: Patch for Re: [HACKERS] Bug of PL/pgSQL parser
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-07-30 19:24:27
Subject: Re: Patch for Re: [HACKERS] Bug of PL/pgSQL parser

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group