Re: lock listing

From: nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org (Neil Conway)
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: lock listing
Date: 2002-07-20 01:04:10
Message-ID: 20020720010410.GB24659@klamath.dyndns.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

On Fri, Jul 19, 2002 at 08:59:50PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Even with userlocks enabled, I don't think you have to use them to use
> PostgreSQL, so you should be OK. Of course, as soon as you load the
> userlocks module, you have GPL'ed yourself.

Ok, sounds reasonable to me.

While we're on the topic, there was talk a couple months ago of removing
or asking the authors to relicense the contrib/ modules that are GPL'd
(or perhaps LGPL'd). Would this be a good idea? If so, I can do it...

Cheers,

Neil

--
Neil Conway <neilconway(at)rogers(dot)com>
PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-07-20 02:21:27 Re: lock listing
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-07-20 00:59:50 Re: lock listing