Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: lock listing

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: lock listing
Date: 2002-07-20 00:07:52
Message-ID: 200207200007.g6K07q325405@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Neil Conway wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2002 at 01:21:10PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Why does this patch arbitrarily remove the #ifdefs and documentation
> > for USER_LOCKS?  That seems quite unrelated to the stated purpose.
> 
> I probably should have mentioned that -- it looked like dead code,
> and the behavior that it referred to (a loadable module called
> user-locks.c, which doesn't make sense to begin with) doesn't
> appear to exist anymore.

Is it contrib/userlock/?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-07-20 00:17:14
Subject: Re: prepareable statements
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-07-19 21:15:43
Subject: Re: lock listing

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group