Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: CLUSTER patch

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)atentus(dot)com>,pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CLUSTER patch
Date: 2002-07-18 15:10:38
Message-ID: 200207181510.g6IFAc411890@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
> 
> Given that this patch is specifically stated not to work:
> 
> >> Anyway, there's still a big problem with this patch: the pg_depend
> >> information gets messed up after CLUSTER, so a clustered table cannot be
> >> dropped.  I don't know why is this.

Wow, that is strange since it has the same oid as before.

> I object to it being applied now.

Oh, I didn't see that part of his message; will remove from queue.  I
know I was waiting to hear if the proper way to drop the temp table was
using object drop or drop it directly.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-07-18 15:11:53
Subject: Re: CLUSTER patch
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-07-18 13:39:50
Subject: Re: Between Node

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group