Re: mistake in sql99 compatibility?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: mistake in sql99 compatibility?
Date: 2002-06-28 18:57:27
Message-ID: 200206281857.g5SIvRM22436@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> The cvs docs say that we support the 'WITH CHECK OPTION' on views, but the
> TODO says we don't...

TODO updated. Not sure when it was added but I see it in SGML docs.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-06-28 19:21:33 Re: mistake in sql99 compatibility?
Previous Message Neil Conway 2002-06-28 17:41:54 prepareable statements