Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: psql 7.2.1: \d (alone) missing from \?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jay Berkenbilt <ejb(at)ql(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: psql 7.2.1: \d (alone) missing from \?
Date: 2002-06-28 18:19:16
Message-ID: 200206281819.g5SIJGG18883@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> 
> This problem is so simple, the subject pretty much says it all.  For
> the sake of completeness, I'm running PostgreSQL 7.2.1 as supplied by
> RedHat in their 7.3 release for i386.  This bug report pertains only
> to the psql front end.
> 
> The command
> 
> \d
> 
> all by itself (with no arguments) lists all relations along with the
> type and owner.  This fact is, however, not mentioned in the help
> message you get with \?, which lists loads of other things you can
> with \d but forgets to mention \d all by itself.

I see it in psql 7.2.1 with \?:

    \d [NAME]      describe table (or view, index, sequence)

Don't you have that line?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026



In response to

Responses

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Jay BerkenbiltDate: 2002-06-28 20:16:26
Subject: Re: psql 7.2.1: \d (alone) missing from \?
Previous:From: Hiroshi InoueDate: 2002-06-28 05:40:12
Subject: Re: [ODBC] "Field is too small"

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group