Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: FW: Patch for current_schemas to optionally include implicit

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: FW: Patch for current_schemas to optionally include implicit
Date: 2002-06-14 16:33:52
Message-ID: 200206141633.g5EGXqS07326@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:

	http://candle.pha.pa.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches

I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------


Dave Page wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us] 
> > Sent: 14 June 2002 06:25
> > To: Bruce Momjian
> > Cc: Dave Page; pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCHES] FW: Patch for current_schemas to 
> > optionally include implicit 
> > 
> > 
> > Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > > Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied 
> > patches list at:
> > > 	http://candle.pha.pa.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches
> > > I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
> > 
> > I believe I objected to that one... we need something like it 
> > but Dave's first cut wasn't right.
> 
> Second cut attached. This one just adds a boolean option to the existing
> function to indicate that implicit schemas are to be included (or not).
> I remembered the docs as well this time :-)
> 
> BTW: Tom, I noticed that temp schemas get added to the path before
> pg_catalog - I would have expected pg_catalog to always be first or have
> I missed something obvious?
> 
> Regards, Dave.

Content-Description: current_schemas.patch

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> 
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-06-14 16:34:57
Subject: Re: FW: Patch for current_schemas to optionally include implicit
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-06-14 16:32:26
Subject: Re: FW: Patch for current_schemas to optionally include implicit

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group