On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 06:08:21PM -0700, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> clients. We have been very low-key (imho) in representing this solution
> to the developer community, but it should be considered for applications
> matching its capabilities.
I should like to emphasise that I have no desire to run down rserv --
I think it's pretty good, and I'm more than happy with its
performance. That I'm now facing a feature-lust argument for ORAC is
a political, and not technical problem.
> Full transactional integrity across primary
> and secondary servers is not easy to come by and not offered by most
> other solutions.
Exactly, plus there appears to be a big price to be paid for that
Andrew Sullivan 87 Mowat Avenue
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M6K 3E3
+1 416 646 3304 x110
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Alessio Bragadini||Date: 2002-05-30 13:04:19|
|Subject: Re: wierd AND condition evaluation for plpgsql|
|Previous:||From: Oleg Bartunov||Date: 2002-05-30 10:13:13|
|Subject: Re: Null values in indexes |