Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper(at)redhat(dot)com>,PostgreSQL Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug
Date: 2002-05-26 03:32:40
Message-ID: 20020526003216.B12810-100000@mail1.hub.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sat, 25 May 2002, Michael Meskes wrote:

> No, this is simply not true. The version number is what the upstream
> gives its release. No more no less. What RH does is becoming as subtly
> incompatible a possible. If that's the goal, it doesn't look like free
> software for me. Sure all changes are published, but why forcing this
> kind of difference between linux distributions? Why not calling it 2.2.6
> or something if there has to be some changes that are not compatible?

Or rlibc? :)


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-05-26 04:42:58
Subject: Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers
Previous:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2002-05-26 01:24:33
Subject: Re: Think I see a btree vacuuming bug

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group