| From: | Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction |
| Date: | 2002-04-29 18:39:38 |
| Message-ID: | 200204291839.g3TIdcB16397@saturn.janwieck.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> What happens inside of a nested transaction, assuming we do have those
> evenually ... ?
Folks,
I don't really get it. We had a voting and I think I saw a
clear enough result with #1, transactional behaviour, as the
winner. Maybe I missed something, but what's this
disscussion about?
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2002-04-29 18:41:33 | Re: Vacation in May |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-04-29 18:19:14 | Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction |