Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Lincoln Yeoh <lyeoh(at)pop(dot)jaring(dot)my>, Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction
Date: 2002-04-26 18:32:19
Message-ID: 200204261832.g3QIWJl01927@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > Second, there is the idea of doing #1, and having a GUC variable for #3.
> > Does anyone want that? I think Marc may. Anyone else?
>
> Actually, in light of Tom's comment about it not being the same syntax, I
> have to admit that I missed that syntax difference in the original post :(
> I withdraw my GUC variable desire, unless/until someone does go with an
> 'ALTER SESSION' command ...

It is good we had the 'compatibility' discussion. It is an important
point to always consider.

TODO updated:

o Abort all SET changes made in an aborted transaction

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shra 2002-04-26 19:29:55
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2002-04-26 17:28:53 Re: pg_constraint