Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch

From: Mario Weilguni <mario(dot)weilguni(at)icomedias(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch
Date: 2002-04-24 17:02:49
Message-ID: 200204241902.49852.mario.weilguni@icomedias.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Am Mittwoch, 24. April 2002 16:03 schrieb Bruce Momjian:
> OK, I have applied the following patch to fix these warnings. However,
> I need Mario to confirm these are the right changes. Thanks.

I've checked it and works fine, but the memcpy() prototype says it should be
void pointers. Will this give errors with non-gcc compilers?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Loftis 2002-04-24 17:33:19 Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-04-24 16:53:33 Parser translations and schemas