Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [SQL] 16 parameter limit

From: Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>
To: "John Proctor" <jproctor(at)prium(dot)net>
Cc: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net, pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us,tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [SQL] 16 parameter limit
Date: 2002-04-16 16:04:37
Message-ID: 20020416120437.3e68fcff.nconway@klamath.dyndns.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patchespgsql-sql
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002 23:49:21 -0500
"John Proctor" <jproctor(at)prium(dot)net> wrote:
> However, none of the above is of any value if the performance penalty is 
> large.  And PL/pgSQL needs much more that just the param number increased.

John,

Could you elaborate on what enhancements you'd like to see in PL/pgSQL?

Cheers,

Neil

-- 
Neil Conway <neilconway(at)rogers(dot)com>
PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Rod TaylorDate: 2002-04-16 16:10:56
Subject: Foreign Key woes -- 7.2 and ~7.3
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-04-16 15:51:13
Subject: Re: experimental pg_qcache patch

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-04-16 16:54:13
Subject: Re: ANSI Compliant Inserts
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2002-04-16 14:35:51
Subject: Re: libpq, psql hungarian translation

pgsql-sql by date

Next:From: Hannu KrosingDate: 2002-04-16 19:12:52
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [SQL] 16 parameter limit
Previous:From: KeithRDate: 2002-04-16 14:10:17
Subject: help - JOIN problem

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group