Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Commands/ directory reorganisation

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>,John Gray <jgray(at)azuli(dot)co(dot)uk>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>,Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Commands/ directory reorganisation
Date: 2002-04-15 17:42:02
Message-ID: 20020415144121.C6260-100000@mail1.hub.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
On Sun, 14 Apr 2002, Tom Lane wrote:

> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > Isn't the "cmds" in the file names kind of redundant?
>
> That was at my suggestion, actually.  I thought names like "aggregate.c"
> were too generic --- too easy to confuse with similarly-named files
> elsewhere in the tree.  (For example, I regularly get confused by the
> existence of analyze.c in both commands/ and parser/.)

ya, but shouldn't the fact that its commands/analyze.c and
parser/analyze.c eliminate the confusion? :)




In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: John GrayDate: 2002-04-15 18:03:58
Subject: Re: Commands/ directory reorganisation
Previous:From: Dmitry TkachDate: 2002-04-15 17:07:20
Subject: Alter/update large tables - VERRRY annoying behaviour!

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group