On Sun, 14 Apr 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > Isn't the "cmds" in the file names kind of redundant?
> That was at my suggestion, actually. I thought names like "aggregate.c"
> were too generic --- too easy to confuse with similarly-named files
> elsewhere in the tree. (For example, I regularly get confused by the
> existence of analyze.c in both commands/ and parser/.)
ya, but shouldn't the fact that its commands/analyze.c and
parser/analyze.c eliminate the confusion? :)
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: John Gray||Date: 2002-04-15 18:03:58|
|Subject: Re: Commands/ directory reorganisation|
|Previous:||From: Dmitry Tkach||Date: 2002-04-15 17:07:20|
|Subject: Alter/update large tables - VERRRY annoying behaviour!|