Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

oh, i don't know did it is a bug or not.

From: Terry Lou <terry(at)aitc(dot)com(dot)tw>
To: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: oh, i don't know did it is a bug or not.
Date: 2002-04-08 15:35:14
Message-ID: 20020408232311.D83C.TERRY@aitc.com.tw (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
the problem is
my postgresql compile with enable multi bytes = unicode and my default
language is BIG5 encoding, in previous version of postgresql 7.1 
i can use unicode encoding to do my back-end encoding and client
encoding set to BIG5, with this setting i can insert a chinese word code
(0xf9d6) in to db (ps: it is not standard of BIG5, it is MS950), another
word (0xea4d) work.
but now
in 7.2 when i insert that word into db, i got a "local_to_utf: could not convert (0xf9d6) BIG5 to UTF-8. Ignored"
it seems very bad for me.
but i have try another back-end encoding, the mule_internal and client
big5 is work with that word.
i remember that word is ok for oracle 8i with unicode encoding. 
so that is a standard of unicode,why in 7.2 is fail?
-- 
Terry Lou <terry(at)aitc(dot)com(dot)tw>


Responses

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-04-08 17:44:42
Subject: Re: Problem in Postgresql installation
Previous:From: Pierre-Alexis PaquinDate: 2002-04-08 14:42:18
Subject: Problem in Postgresql installation

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group