On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > > >
> > > > checking the moderator-to-approve listing for you, here are the reason(s):
> > > >
> > > > Reason: GLOBAL ADMIN HEADER: /^subject:\s*set\b/i matched "Subject: SET"
> > > OK, but should posters get email stating it is in the approval queue?
> > > He clearly didn't, and I don't either, but others say they do get such
> > > messages.
> > Not necessarily if it's an admin command.
> istm that we should disable all administrative functions from the main
> mailing lists (this is settable in the configuration). the -request
> addresses handle administration, and it is just plain confusing to find
> that there are some special words that should never be mentioned in the
> subject or body of a message. That isn't appropriate behavior for those
> mailing lists!
I can do this ... it would just mean ppl erroneously sending
subscribe/unsubscribe messages to the list(s) will actually get through
Anyone disagre with this change?
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Marc G. Fournier||Date: 2002-03-29 05:38:03|
|Subject: Re: Mailing List Question |
|Previous:||From: Christopher Kings-Lynne||Date: 2002-03-29 04:18:05|
|Subject: Re: pg_dump 2GB limit?|