Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Rolling v7.2.1 ...

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,"Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Rolling v7.2.1 ...
Date: 2002-03-26 05:20:41
Message-ID: 200203260520.g2Q5Kf610032@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> 
> > > Is this right, or should "majorversion" still be 7.2?  Right offhand
> > > the latter seems correct ...
> >
> > I wasn't sure what to do here.  I figured if the docs were regenerated,
> > it should say 7.2.1, and if they aren't, then they will stay as 7.2.
> 
> But neither explanation warrants setting "majorversion" to 7.2.1.

Why?  Why shouldn't the documentation match the release number?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2002-03-26 05:23:19
Subject: Re: Rolling v7.2.1 ...
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-03-26 05:09:37
Subject: Re: Rolling v7.2.1 ...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group