Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: DocBook upgrade

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: DocBook upgrade
Date: 2002-03-21 18:39:34
Message-ID: 200203211839.g2LIdYJ07968@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I once wrote:
> 
> > Briefly after we open the floodgates for 7.2+1 I would like to upgrade our
> > documentation sources to use DocBook 4.1.
> 
> Just so you know what the status on this is:
> 
> As it turns out, DocBook 4.1 (and 4.0)  has some overly restrictive
> changes to the content model of some elements (read: "what tags can I put
> in what other tags"), and the PostgreSQL documentation is affected by some
> of these cases.  Part of these changes will be reverted in the DocBook 4.2
> release, which went beta the other day and will be released in a month.
> Add to that some time to wait for packages to appear and some general
> gratuitous hestitation, we might be at least 6 to 8 weeks away from this
> move; maybe it won't even be in this cycle.

From your description, I was thinking 6-8 months.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2002-03-22 17:55:25
Subject: Spelling of lock names
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2002-03-21 18:06:10
Subject: Re: DocBook upgrade

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group